Review




Structured Review

Epitracker Inc idtracker
Idtracker, supplied by Epitracker Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/idtracker/product/Epitracker Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
idtracker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

90
MathWorks Inc idtracker
Idtracker, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/idtracker/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
idtracker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Stoelting inc idtracker
Idtracker, supplied by Stoelting inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/idtracker/product/Stoelting inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
idtracker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc idtracker in matlab
Idtracker In Matlab, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/idtracker in matlab/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
idtracker in matlab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Stoelting inc idtracker® vídeo monitoring software
Idtracker® Vídeo Monitoring Software, supplied by Stoelting inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/idtracker® vídeo monitoring software/product/Stoelting inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
idtracker® vídeo monitoring software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Epitracker Inc idtracker
Idtracker, supplied by Epitracker Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/idtracker/product/Epitracker Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
idtracker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc idtracker-beta running under matlab release 2019a or above
( A ) Schematics of the assay system. The recording tank was back-lighted by an infrared (IR) LED array with a white paper diffuser. The IR camera was set at the top of the tank, and fish movement was recorded. ( B ) One example frame of recorded cavefish video. Coloured lines represent the 1 s (20 frames) trajectories of individual fish detected by <t>idTracker</t> software. ( C ) Example trajectories of each cavefish from a 2.5 min recording. Each fish shape’s ID was determined by idTracker, and its X-Y coordinates were traced across the entire recording time. The top row (four panels) shows the X-Y-time traces of each of four fish. The bottom row represents the X-Y traces by stacking the time series of the corresponding top row panel.
Idtracker Beta Running Under Matlab Release 2019a Or Above, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/idtracker-beta running under matlab release 2019a or above/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
idtracker-beta running under matlab release 2019a or above - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) Schematics of the assay system. The recording tank was back-lighted by an infrared (IR) LED array with a white paper diffuser. The IR camera was set at the top of the tank, and fish movement was recorded. ( B ) One example frame of recorded cavefish video. Coloured lines represent the 1 s (20 frames) trajectories of individual fish detected by idTracker software. ( C ) Example trajectories of each cavefish from a 2.5 min recording. Each fish shape’s ID was determined by idTracker, and its X-Y coordinates were traced across the entire recording time. The top row (four panels) shows the X-Y-time traces of each of four fish. The bottom row represents the X-Y traces by stacking the time series of the corresponding top row panel.

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Social-like responses are inducible in asocial Mexican cavefish despite the exhibition of strong repetitive behavior

doi: 10.7554/eLife.72463

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Schematics of the assay system. The recording tank was back-lighted by an infrared (IR) LED array with a white paper diffuser. The IR camera was set at the top of the tank, and fish movement was recorded. ( B ) One example frame of recorded cavefish video. Coloured lines represent the 1 s (20 frames) trajectories of individual fish detected by idTracker software. ( C ) Example trajectories of each cavefish from a 2.5 min recording. Each fish shape’s ID was determined by idTracker, and its X-Y coordinates were traced across the entire recording time. The top row (four panels) shows the X-Y-time traces of each of four fish. The bottom row represents the X-Y traces by stacking the time series of the corresponding top row panel.

Article Snippet: Using these background-subtracted videos, the X-Y coordinates of each fish were extracted by tracking each fish’s ID under the ID-detection algorithm of idTracker (idTracker-beta running under MATLAB release 2019a or above; https://github.com/idTracker/idTracker/tree/Beta ; ; The MathWorks Inc, Natick, MA, USA).

Techniques: Software

( A, B ) Measurements of nearest neighbour distance (NND) ( A ) and interindividual distance (IID) ( B ). Surface fish are shown as black lines, and cavefish are shown as orange lines (N = 18 groups of four each). The means ± standard errors of the mean (s.e.m.) in each frame are shown. Smaller panels on the right side of each of ( A ) and ( B ) show averages of NND or IID sampled every 30 s of the 300 s assays. n.s.: not significant. ( C ) An example frame of recorded surface fish video. Coloured lines represent trajectories of individual fish detected by idTracker software (1 s/20-frame trajectories). A red-labeled fish was followed by a blue-labelled fish. ( D ) Distribution of IID across all frames of 18 surface fish groups, where each group yields six IIDs from each pair among the four fish ( 4 C 2 = 6, black line: means ± 95 % confidence intervals (CIs)). Similarly, the distribution of IIDs was calculated from 1,280 simulated randomly sampled groups (blue line: means ± 95% CI). IID between 3 and 6 cm showed significant separation between actual and simulated IIDs (yellow shaded areas). Inset shows the magnified 3–6 cm interval. *: p < 0.05, t -test between the actual and simulated data adjusted by the Holm correction within the yellow shaded area. ( E ) Inverse cumulative distribution of the nearby-event durations. The inverse cumulative distributions for the event durations whose IIDs were less than 5 cm are shown, where the black lines represent the results from the actual 18 surface fish groups (means ± 95% CI) and the blue lines represent the results of the 1,280 simulated groups (means ± 95% CI). In the actual surface fish data, the nearby-interaction durations between 3 and 8 s were significantly higher than the simulated surface fish data. **: p < 0.01, t -test between the actual and simulated data adjusted by the Holm correction within the yellow shaded area. ( F ) Swimming velocity during or out of nearby interactions. The mean swimming speeds (1) during the 4 s before the nearby-interaction bout, (2) during the bout, (3) during 4 s after the bout, and (4) during out-of-bout periods are shown for surface fish (left) and cavefish (right) by using the actual and simulated dataset (N = 72 from 18 groups for each of surface fish and cavefish and for each of the actual and randomly sampled data). Swimming speeds are lower in the cavefish during the bout in the actual data. ( G ) Pirate plots depicting nearby-interaction durations detected by the newly developed method. The plot of the actual data is shown in black and white, and the simulated data are shown in light blue (N = 72 from 18 groups for each of the surface fish and cavefish). The thicknesses of the beans represent data density. *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001. All statistical scores are available in . The new detection protocol for determining nearby interactions is described in Materials and methods and – . The involvement of the lateral line sensory system in the nearby interaction was tested, and the data are presented in . Figure 2—source data 1. Surface fish’s and cavefish’s inter-individual distance (cm) in every 0.05 s. Figure 2—source data 2. Surface fish’s and cavefish’s inter-individual distance (cm) in every 0.05 s. Figure 2—source data 3. Event numbers counted under the cut-off distances between pairs of fish in the actual and simulated surface fish data. Figure 2—source data 4. Nearby event numbers shorter than 5 cm distance counted more than cut-off duration between pairs of fish in the actual and simulated surface fish data. Figure 2—source data 5. Speed (cm/s) during the nearby interaction events and other periods, and the detected nearby interaction duration (s) comparing between the actual and simulated random data.

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Social-like responses are inducible in asocial Mexican cavefish despite the exhibition of strong repetitive behavior

doi: 10.7554/eLife.72463

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A, B ) Measurements of nearest neighbour distance (NND) ( A ) and interindividual distance (IID) ( B ). Surface fish are shown as black lines, and cavefish are shown as orange lines (N = 18 groups of four each). The means ± standard errors of the mean (s.e.m.) in each frame are shown. Smaller panels on the right side of each of ( A ) and ( B ) show averages of NND or IID sampled every 30 s of the 300 s assays. n.s.: not significant. ( C ) An example frame of recorded surface fish video. Coloured lines represent trajectories of individual fish detected by idTracker software (1 s/20-frame trajectories). A red-labeled fish was followed by a blue-labelled fish. ( D ) Distribution of IID across all frames of 18 surface fish groups, where each group yields six IIDs from each pair among the four fish ( 4 C 2 = 6, black line: means ± 95 % confidence intervals (CIs)). Similarly, the distribution of IIDs was calculated from 1,280 simulated randomly sampled groups (blue line: means ± 95% CI). IID between 3 and 6 cm showed significant separation between actual and simulated IIDs (yellow shaded areas). Inset shows the magnified 3–6 cm interval. *: p < 0.05, t -test between the actual and simulated data adjusted by the Holm correction within the yellow shaded area. ( E ) Inverse cumulative distribution of the nearby-event durations. The inverse cumulative distributions for the event durations whose IIDs were less than 5 cm are shown, where the black lines represent the results from the actual 18 surface fish groups (means ± 95% CI) and the blue lines represent the results of the 1,280 simulated groups (means ± 95% CI). In the actual surface fish data, the nearby-interaction durations between 3 and 8 s were significantly higher than the simulated surface fish data. **: p < 0.01, t -test between the actual and simulated data adjusted by the Holm correction within the yellow shaded area. ( F ) Swimming velocity during or out of nearby interactions. The mean swimming speeds (1) during the 4 s before the nearby-interaction bout, (2) during the bout, (3) during 4 s after the bout, and (4) during out-of-bout periods are shown for surface fish (left) and cavefish (right) by using the actual and simulated dataset (N = 72 from 18 groups for each of surface fish and cavefish and for each of the actual and randomly sampled data). Swimming speeds are lower in the cavefish during the bout in the actual data. ( G ) Pirate plots depicting nearby-interaction durations detected by the newly developed method. The plot of the actual data is shown in black and white, and the simulated data are shown in light blue (N = 72 from 18 groups for each of the surface fish and cavefish). The thicknesses of the beans represent data density. *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001. All statistical scores are available in . The new detection protocol for determining nearby interactions is described in Materials and methods and – . The involvement of the lateral line sensory system in the nearby interaction was tested, and the data are presented in . Figure 2—source data 1. Surface fish’s and cavefish’s inter-individual distance (cm) in every 0.05 s. Figure 2—source data 2. Surface fish’s and cavefish’s inter-individual distance (cm) in every 0.05 s. Figure 2—source data 3. Event numbers counted under the cut-off distances between pairs of fish in the actual and simulated surface fish data. Figure 2—source data 4. Nearby event numbers shorter than 5 cm distance counted more than cut-off duration between pairs of fish in the actual and simulated surface fish data. Figure 2—source data 5. Speed (cm/s) during the nearby interaction events and other periods, and the detected nearby interaction duration (s) comparing between the actual and simulated random data.

Article Snippet: Using these background-subtracted videos, the X-Y coordinates of each fish were extracted by tracking each fish’s ID under the ID-detection algorithm of idTracker (idTracker-beta running under MATLAB release 2019a or above; https://github.com/idTracker/idTracker/tree/Beta ; ; The MathWorks Inc, Natick, MA, USA).

Techniques: Software, Labeling

( A ) An example frame of recorded surface fish video. Coloured lines represent trajectories of each individual fish detected by idTracker software. Trajectories for 1 s (20 frames) are shown. ( B ) A histogram for the bout durations filtered by the cut-off distance (5 cm or less) in a 15 s recording (surface fish group: N = 4). ( C ) A raster plot of the nearby-interaction bouts filtered by ≤5 cm and ≥4 s. The interaction categories for a fish pair are the same in . Frequent changes in the leading fish appeared within each pair and within each bout (i.e. frequent switches between orange (fish one leading) and yellow colours (fish two leading)). ( D ) Each nearby interaction from the top view. The thick lines represent the fish trajectories during the first second of the bout. The thin lines represent the fish trajectories during the remainder of the bout, as shown in . Figure 2—figure supplement 3—source data 1. The X-Y coordinates (cm) and distances of each pair (cm) of a four-surface fish group under the light.

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Social-like responses are inducible in asocial Mexican cavefish despite the exhibition of strong repetitive behavior

doi: 10.7554/eLife.72463

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) An example frame of recorded surface fish video. Coloured lines represent trajectories of each individual fish detected by idTracker software. Trajectories for 1 s (20 frames) are shown. ( B ) A histogram for the bout durations filtered by the cut-off distance (5 cm or less) in a 15 s recording (surface fish group: N = 4). ( C ) A raster plot of the nearby-interaction bouts filtered by ≤5 cm and ≥4 s. The interaction categories for a fish pair are the same in . Frequent changes in the leading fish appeared within each pair and within each bout (i.e. frequent switches between orange (fish one leading) and yellow colours (fish two leading)). ( D ) Each nearby interaction from the top view. The thick lines represent the fish trajectories during the first second of the bout. The thin lines represent the fish trajectories during the remainder of the bout, as shown in . Figure 2—figure supplement 3—source data 1. The X-Y coordinates (cm) and distances of each pair (cm) of a four-surface fish group under the light.

Article Snippet: Using these background-subtracted videos, the X-Y coordinates of each fish were extracted by tracking each fish’s ID under the ID-detection algorithm of idTracker (idTracker-beta running under MATLAB release 2019a or above; https://github.com/idTracker/idTracker/tree/Beta ; ; The MathWorks Inc, Natick, MA, USA).

Techniques: Software

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Social-like responses are inducible in asocial Mexican cavefish despite the exhibition of strong repetitive behavior

doi: 10.7554/eLife.72463

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: Using these background-subtracted videos, the X-Y coordinates of each fish were extracted by tracking each fish’s ID under the ID-detection algorithm of idTracker (idTracker-beta running under MATLAB release 2019a or above; https://github.com/idTracker/idTracker/tree/Beta ; ; The MathWorks Inc, Natick, MA, USA).

Techniques: Software